High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
JAMA · 2025 · n = 1,766 · Multicenter RCT (Brazil)
This noninferiority multicenter RCT across 33 Brazilian ICUs evaluated 1,766 patients randomized to High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) or Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) across 5 acute respiratory failure (ARF) groups: nonimmunocompromised hypoxemic, immunocompromised hypoxemic, COPD exacerbation with acidosis, cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), and COVID-19.
Overall, HFNO met noninferiority criteria for the primary endpoint of 7-day intubation or death (39% vs 38%). However, subgroup nuances were critical: enrollment was stopped for futility in immunocompromised patients due to higher primary event rates in HFNO (57.1% vs 36.4%), whereas nonimmunocompromised hypoxemic patients showed equal efficacy (32.5% vs 33.1%). Post-hoc non-hierarchical models raised caution regarding signal instability in COPD and ACPE.
Reported data
n=1,766Intubation or death
7 daysImmunocompromisedIntubation or death
7 daysNonimmunocompromised hypoxaemicIntubation or death
7 daysNot reportedeffect estimate · confidence intervals · p-values